The goal of this video is to provide the listener/ viewer with an excellent example of how someone who questions the accepted authority over the individual, the established hierarchy or raises intriguing questions about our way of life is handled by that same authority/hierarchy. This is the first step: Neutralizing your enemy. Of course the next are murder and such, but hopefully that won’t be the case for all of those who are the targets. Please take this video and what is said not as an attack on this individual, but as a way to identify a possible sentinel in the matrix. Because when a sentinel is neutralized another is dispatched meaning more are to come.
I will cover this example once to demonstrate how I was approached by what I believe is a highly sophisticated agent or what I refer to as a sentinel; someone who is dispatched to neutralize defected batteries. Follow carefully as you’ll learn the subtleties of their craft.
Here is some background on how you approached me and how I responded. Please review then continue to the second wave of comment by you so there is no confusion.
First GGN videos mrfaithandphysics commented on: Overdue Library Fees Warrant Arrest, Calling All Starship Troopers, Lucifers Justice System
COMMENT/QUESTION BLOC #1:
“One of your best. But it's McCartney not McCarthy, if you're talking about the other Beatle, Paul McCartney. I really enjoy your rapid fire (without sounding like your tweaking) to the point synopsis of lesser headline events. Very good work. Thank you. I'm not entirely sure though, are you against teaching "sensitivity training" (re: gays) or just brainwashing in general. If you are a "God hates Fags" kinda guy, then I'm in the wrong place! But still, nice work.”
mrfaithandphysics 3 days ago
Okay.. You make a positive observation. Great! Then say “One of your best” which leads me to believe you have seen many if not a good deal of my work. Yes or no? Can you see why I would recommend you check out more of my video instead of asking me to explain my entire philosophy/ideology in a comment board or even a personal message which cannot be done?
Then you correct my pronunciation of McCartney which again is “Great!” Thank you for that. I’m always open to positive constructive criticism although I would have to mention I believe it was a non vital detail as The Beatles are pretty well know globally for some time now and my point was sure to be received effectively. Then you say almost to a T what two long time listeners have commented/ told to me in the past: “I really enjoy your rapid fire (without sounding like your tweaking) to the point synopsis of lesser headline events.”
Alright… I thought that was a little fishy cause that’s what a troll would do but I give you the benefit of the doubt still. Shall we proceed?
Okay…. You then say, “ I'm not entirely sure though, are you against teaching "sensitivity training" (re: gays) or just brainwashing in general. If you are a "God hates Fags" kinda guy, then I'm in the wrong place! But still, nice work.”
Honest inquiry here. Your initial comment saying, “One of your best” again leading me to believe you seen others which would imply you understand what I’m saying/proposing because I’ve covered it numerous times in the past.
I STILL give you my time at this point and the benefit of the doubt by replying:
@mrfaithandphysics McCartney...That's right. Thank you for the correction. As far as your question am I a, "God hates Fags," person I replied to an earlier inquiry and replied, "@illuminati Thoughts I appreciate your comment and want you to know that I respect atheist for their rigorous dedication to empiricism."
ddarko2012 3 days ago
My reply to your “God Hates Fags“ question was answered with “I respect atheist for their rigorous dedication to empiricism” Again… I had included this in my videos in the past meaning people who say,” One of your best” which are to insinuate that you have seen many of my prior videos.
Some more background for you so can get a clearer picture of events transpired thus far. Numerous viewers had notified me at that time that lluminatithoughts was a troll wasting people’s time and trying to distract those in the comment board. Also to discredit the uploader of the vids. At that point I had blocked less then 15 people in two years and that’s a liberal estimate. I avoid blocking at all cost, usually after I expend more than two hours on a commenter and the commenter appears to not be concerned with reaching an intelligent point. I then blocked him. Then you came along with a few other possible suspects.
Okay.. I then follow up in a second comment because your question required more time/space of me.
@mrfaithandphysics ..."I've also stated publicly before that it is my belief that homosexuals are spiritually advanced. But life like someones philosophy cannot be explained in a comment board nor in three videos." Hopefully that answers your inquiry.
ddarko2012 3 hours ago
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At this point I’m a little wary as any semi-intelligent cognizant human being aware of the existent of trolls and psychological operations should be.
Second GGN Titled GGN :: Police Gone Wild, Obama Launches Anti-Terrorism Department, Go to Scoo..Become A Foo! video MrfaithandPhysics commented on:
COMMENT/ QUESTION BLOC #2:
"Hey! I don't question authority! I know NOTHING! Good report, but question to you: Are they creating this Police State because "they" (another side of "we") are inherently evil? Or do they just know something that we don't and in their own sad way, they are actually trying to protect and save what they can? At any cost? Because yes, there are a lot of "us" broken. Stupid and belligerent. Drunk and sedated. Need I go on?"
mrfaithandphysics 3 days ago
You start again with a positive comment “Good report,” again proceeded by a big “BUT” that led me to immediately perceive you and your inquiries as a possible troll ( a person who is purposefully waste others time, and distract of the viewers) Did I use “us” with the words,” Broken, Stupid and Belligerent?” Let me answer that for you No. You decided to sum up what I said and reiterated it in your own way. Then you proceed to leave me an ultimatum between “they” or them being “inherently evil” or “they just know something that we don't and in their own sad way, they are actually trying to protect and save what they can? “
At this point I’m ready to hopefully find some kind of resolution with you. I then proceed to answer your question trying again to not have my words be misconstrued by you.
@mrfaithandphysics "I'm trying to figure that out myself, but I don't think, "they (are) creating this Police State because "they" (another side of "we") are inherently evil?" I don't perceive reality in the manner that you just described so I'm not sure how to answer your question. I understand the philosophy/ideology that your are injecting here and I don't support or condone it. "The Watchmen" asks that question. However, I respect them for their challenging us."
ddarko2012 3 days ago
In my opinion, that was an honest and polite response to your inquiry hoping for an end to this back and forth that was leading nowhere.
Next...
COMMENT/ QUESTION BLOC #3:
@ddarko2012 Oh, ouch. The Watchmen? Isn't that Johova Witness or something? Noooo. Not me. Ok, fair enough. What is their motivation to "direct" the show, if not greed, domanance, or other greater or lesser? sins, evil or just naughty? Are they sick? What is your...philosophy/ideology? I figure you think the devil is making them do it. Or does your brand place lesser importance on that side of the bible? Just asking. Research call it.
mrfaithandphysics 3 days ago
First you act as if I offended you and that you offended me with, "Oh, ouch. The Watchmen? Isn't that Johova Witness or something? Noooo. Not me. Ok, fair enough.
I was simply answering your question by using the Watchmen’s plot and proposed moral question. The Watchmen comic/movie is exactly what you described to a T when you asked me, “Or do they just know something that we don't and in their own sad way, they are actually trying to protect and save what they can? At any cost?” This supposedly came from a question you personally had about “they.” Then you inject religion into my reply to YOUR humpteenth question about “they” and their ideology by saying, “Isn't that Johova Witness or something? “Noo not me.” You made the comment that was strait from the comic’s plot not me and then Note.. I had already answered your second question, “What is their motivation to "direct" the show?” when I replied by saying, “"I'm trying to figure that out myself, but I don't think, "they (are) creating this Police State because "they" (another side of "we") are inherently evil?" I don't perceive reality in the manner that you just described so I'm not sure how to answer your question. This is after I thought I was pretty cordial, open and honest and as patient with as possible even after I started to have serious reservations about you. I’ve spent at least five hours trying to come to a resolution to your public inquires about “they” and such. After another round of questions/ comments you went further by saying,” (This is where you turned me off)
“, If not greed, domanance, or other greater or lesser sins, evil or just naughty?” I repeatedly answered that question then you ask the above question which indicates to me that you understood what I was saying in regards to “The Watchmen” yet you acted as if you were confused or lacking knowledge on the subject. This conversation should’ve ended here.
Okay…Then you throw out the option about “they” being “sick” which again dismisses what I had previously said in my reply about the ideology of “they.” That’s the second time now. You understand and acknowledge this right? Then you proceed to ask me “What is your(ie my)...philosophy/ideology?"
This is after the whole, “One of your best” (videos) comment by which you most likely intended to have me believe you had seen many if not a good deal of my work.
Again for you… because you failed to receive the message in earlier communication.(Intended or unintended) where I said, “But life like someones philosophy cannot be explained in a comment board nor in three videos." Hopefully that answers your inquiry “Can you see why I would recommend you check out more of my video instead of asking me to explain my entire philosophy/ideology in a comment board or even a personal message which cannot be done?”
@mrfaithandphysics No offense here, but why are you so interested in performing "research" on my "brand?" Watch some of the videos I've produced in the past couple years & you'll understand my "brand." These videos are about true freedom, peace and understanding.
This is the second from last comment by you that led me to blocking you from commenting in the board in the future.
"I figure you think the devil is making them do it. Or does your brand place lesser importance on that side of the bible? Just asking. Research call it."
mrfaithandphysics
"I've been cornered a record number of times in the past 24 hours due to the recent set of videos whereby trolls are injecting stereotypical religious insinuations in the form of insincere chivalry and 20 Questions."
ddarko2012 3 days ago
That didn't necessarily mean you, but I was hinting at that this may be the case as your style of questions continued after I took the time to respond.
After all of the stress and whirlwind of psychological warfare carried out against me I retreated for a few days to handle some personal business and gather my thoughts, get balanced with the nature and look what was on my channel guys.
@DDarko2012
Block? You block subscribers who tell you your work is great but engage in discussion of your faith? You censor those who's handle includes "faith" and wonder why they want to know your own brand? Well, that answers a bit. I'm sorry, but I've studied them all and there? is many versions of God. Puritan, Mormon, catholic, orthodox, Jewish, Baptist, all different, all competing. They ARE brands. Sorry. Evangelicals, Methodist, come on. Censored for that? Wow. Sorry I asked. Nice answer.
If you are genuinely sincere about asking me serious intelligent questions about “they” or whatever and took the time to watch more of the information I’ve provided in the past almost two and half years and/or would understand what I'm presenting in these videos can be misconstrued by trolls which is their tactic, then you would come to the realization that asking the questions that you asked in the tone that you did and the in the way you did it was to me enough for me not to spend anymore time on you.
This video is not intended to isolate, point fingers or personally attack mrfaithandphysics or JonDyou or any other individual, troll or psychological warfare agent, but is a a message/ lesson to sincere genuine independent individual GGN viewers, and even trolls and/or psychological warfare agents. If you are or can become aware that the topics discussed in regards to any video that questions authority or the established “system” are met by stiff opposition then you should realize that I don't want to be neutralized by a troll and/or /PsyOp. I very seldom "censor" or block those who aren't commenting on the issues covered in the video and /or consume much of my time in the comment board by not asking questions that are intended to reach a truth or resolution but to distract me and the other viewers from the intended message of the content provided in a video. Mainstream media does a good enough job providing a similar circus show of disinformation and I will not allow it. It is through reasoning/ analytical thoughts, emotions/feeling that help shape whether block someone, but ultimately it is my intuition that makes the final decision. If I blocked you and you were sincerely an independent individual that is not being influence by an outside source/entity then I apologize, but if not then you surely deserved it.
This “person” has challenged me. That has led me to do some long overdue writing so in that respect I thank you mrfaithandphysics or JonDyou. This is what life is all about. May the benevolent creator of the universe or universes bless you.
I will cover this example once to demonstrate how I was approached by what I believe is a highly sophisticated agent or what I refer to as a sentinel; someone who is dispatched to neutralize defected batteries. Follow carefully as you’ll learn the subtleties of their craft.
Here is some background on how you approached me and how I responded. Please review then continue to the second wave of comment by you so there is no confusion.
First GGN videos mrfaithandphysics commented on: Overdue Library Fees Warrant Arrest, Calling All Starship Troopers, Lucifers Justice System
COMMENT/QUESTION BLOC #1:
“One of your best. But it's McCartney not McCarthy, if you're talking about the other Beatle, Paul McCartney. I really enjoy your rapid fire (without sounding like your tweaking) to the point synopsis of lesser headline events. Very good work. Thank you. I'm not entirely sure though, are you against teaching "sensitivity training" (re: gays) or just brainwashing in general. If you are a "God hates Fags" kinda guy, then I'm in the wrong place! But still, nice work.”
mrfaithandphysics 3 days ago
Okay.. You make a positive observation. Great! Then say “One of your best” which leads me to believe you have seen many if not a good deal of my work. Yes or no? Can you see why I would recommend you check out more of my video instead of asking me to explain my entire philosophy/ideology in a comment board or even a personal message which cannot be done?
Then you correct my pronunciation of McCartney which again is “Great!” Thank you for that. I’m always open to positive constructive criticism although I would have to mention I believe it was a non vital detail as The Beatles are pretty well know globally for some time now and my point was sure to be received effectively. Then you say almost to a T what two long time listeners have commented/ told to me in the past: “I really enjoy your rapid fire (without sounding like your tweaking) to the point synopsis of lesser headline events.”
Alright… I thought that was a little fishy cause that’s what a troll would do but I give you the benefit of the doubt still. Shall we proceed?
Okay…. You then say, “ I'm not entirely sure though, are you against teaching "sensitivity training" (re: gays) or just brainwashing in general. If you are a "God hates Fags" kinda guy, then I'm in the wrong place! But still, nice work.”
Honest inquiry here. Your initial comment saying, “One of your best” again leading me to believe you seen others which would imply you understand what I’m saying/proposing because I’ve covered it numerous times in the past.
I STILL give you my time at this point and the benefit of the doubt by replying:
@mrfaithandphysics McCartney...That's right. Thank you for the correction. As far as your question am I a, "God hates Fags," person I replied to an earlier inquiry and replied, "@illuminati Thoughts I appreciate your comment and want you to know that I respect atheist for their rigorous dedication to empiricism."
ddarko2012 3 days ago
My reply to your “God Hates Fags“ question was answered with “I respect atheist for their rigorous dedication to empiricism” Again… I had included this in my videos in the past meaning people who say,” One of your best” which are to insinuate that you have seen many of my prior videos.
Some more background for you so can get a clearer picture of events transpired thus far. Numerous viewers had notified me at that time that lluminatithoughts was a troll wasting people’s time and trying to distract those in the comment board. Also to discredit the uploader of the vids. At that point I had blocked less then 15 people in two years and that’s a liberal estimate. I avoid blocking at all cost, usually after I expend more than two hours on a commenter and the commenter appears to not be concerned with reaching an intelligent point. I then blocked him. Then you came along with a few other possible suspects.
Okay.. I then follow up in a second comment because your question required more time/space of me.
@mrfaithandphysics ..."I've also stated publicly before that it is my belief that homosexuals are spiritually advanced. But life like someones philosophy cannot be explained in a comment board nor in three videos." Hopefully that answers your inquiry.
ddarko2012 3 hours ago
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At this point I’m a little wary as any semi-intelligent cognizant human being aware of the existent of trolls and psychological operations should be.
Second GGN Titled GGN :: Police Gone Wild, Obama Launches Anti-Terrorism Department, Go to Scoo..Become A Foo! video MrfaithandPhysics commented on:
COMMENT/ QUESTION BLOC #2:
"Hey! I don't question authority! I know NOTHING! Good report, but question to you: Are they creating this Police State because "they" (another side of "we") are inherently evil? Or do they just know something that we don't and in their own sad way, they are actually trying to protect and save what they can? At any cost? Because yes, there are a lot of "us" broken. Stupid and belligerent. Drunk and sedated. Need I go on?"
mrfaithandphysics 3 days ago
You start again with a positive comment “Good report,” again proceeded by a big “BUT” that led me to immediately perceive you and your inquiries as a possible troll ( a person who is purposefully waste others time, and distract of the viewers) Did I use “us” with the words,” Broken, Stupid and Belligerent?” Let me answer that for you No. You decided to sum up what I said and reiterated it in your own way. Then you proceed to leave me an ultimatum between “they” or them being “inherently evil” or “they just know something that we don't and in their own sad way, they are actually trying to protect and save what they can? “
At this point I’m ready to hopefully find some kind of resolution with you. I then proceed to answer your question trying again to not have my words be misconstrued by you.
@mrfaithandphysics "I'm trying to figure that out myself, but I don't think, "they (are) creating this Police State because "they" (another side of "we") are inherently evil?" I don't perceive reality in the manner that you just described so I'm not sure how to answer your question. I understand the philosophy/ideology that your are injecting here and I don't support or condone it. "The Watchmen" asks that question. However, I respect them for their challenging us."
ddarko2012 3 days ago
In my opinion, that was an honest and polite response to your inquiry hoping for an end to this back and forth that was leading nowhere.
Next...
COMMENT/ QUESTION BLOC #3:
@ddarko2012 Oh, ouch. The Watchmen? Isn't that Johova Witness or something? Noooo. Not me. Ok, fair enough. What is their motivation to "direct" the show, if not greed, domanance, or other greater or lesser? sins, evil or just naughty? Are they sick? What is your...philosophy/ideology? I figure you think the devil is making them do it. Or does your brand place lesser importance on that side of the bible? Just asking. Research call it.
mrfaithandphysics 3 days ago
First you act as if I offended you and that you offended me with, "Oh, ouch. The Watchmen? Isn't that Johova Witness or something? Noooo. Not me. Ok, fair enough.
I was simply answering your question by using the Watchmen’s plot and proposed moral question. The Watchmen comic/movie is exactly what you described to a T when you asked me, “Or do they just know something that we don't and in their own sad way, they are actually trying to protect and save what they can? At any cost?” This supposedly came from a question you personally had about “they.” Then you inject religion into my reply to YOUR humpteenth question about “they” and their ideology by saying, “Isn't that Johova Witness or something? “Noo not me.” You made the comment that was strait from the comic’s plot not me and then Note.. I had already answered your second question, “What is their motivation to "direct" the show?” when I replied by saying, “"I'm trying to figure that out myself, but I don't think, "they (are) creating this Police State because "they" (another side of "we") are inherently evil?" I don't perceive reality in the manner that you just described so I'm not sure how to answer your question. This is after I thought I was pretty cordial, open and honest and as patient with as possible even after I started to have serious reservations about you. I’ve spent at least five hours trying to come to a resolution to your public inquires about “they” and such. After another round of questions/ comments you went further by saying,” (This is where you turned me off)
“, If not greed, domanance, or other greater or lesser sins, evil or just naughty?” I repeatedly answered that question then you ask the above question which indicates to me that you understood what I was saying in regards to “The Watchmen” yet you acted as if you were confused or lacking knowledge on the subject. This conversation should’ve ended here.
Okay…Then you throw out the option about “they” being “sick” which again dismisses what I had previously said in my reply about the ideology of “they.” That’s the second time now. You understand and acknowledge this right? Then you proceed to ask me “What is your(ie my)...philosophy/ideology?"
This is after the whole, “One of your best” (videos) comment by which you most likely intended to have me believe you had seen many if not a good deal of my work.
Again for you… because you failed to receive the message in earlier communication.(Intended or unintended) where I said, “But life like someones philosophy cannot be explained in a comment board nor in three videos." Hopefully that answers your inquiry “Can you see why I would recommend you check out more of my video instead of asking me to explain my entire philosophy/ideology in a comment board or even a personal message which cannot be done?”
@mrfaithandphysics No offense here, but why are you so interested in performing "research" on my "brand?" Watch some of the videos I've produced in the past couple years & you'll understand my "brand." These videos are about true freedom, peace and understanding.
This is the second from last comment by you that led me to blocking you from commenting in the board in the future.
"I figure you think the devil is making them do it. Or does your brand place lesser importance on that side of the bible? Just asking. Research call it."
mrfaithandphysics
"I've been cornered a record number of times in the past 24 hours due to the recent set of videos whereby trolls are injecting stereotypical religious insinuations in the form of insincere chivalry and 20 Questions."
ddarko2012 3 days ago
That didn't necessarily mean you, but I was hinting at that this may be the case as your style of questions continued after I took the time to respond.
After all of the stress and whirlwind of psychological warfare carried out against me I retreated for a few days to handle some personal business and gather my thoughts, get balanced with the nature and look what was on my channel guys.
@DDarko2012
Block? You block subscribers who tell you your work is great but engage in discussion of your faith? You censor those who's handle includes "faith" and wonder why they want to know your own brand? Well, that answers a bit. I'm sorry, but I've studied them all and there? is many versions of God. Puritan, Mormon, catholic, orthodox, Jewish, Baptist, all different, all competing. They ARE brands. Sorry. Evangelicals, Methodist, come on. Censored for that? Wow. Sorry I asked. Nice answer.
If you are genuinely sincere about asking me serious intelligent questions about “they” or whatever and took the time to watch more of the information I’ve provided in the past almost two and half years and/or would understand what I'm presenting in these videos can be misconstrued by trolls which is their tactic, then you would come to the realization that asking the questions that you asked in the tone that you did and the in the way you did it was to me enough for me not to spend anymore time on you.
This video is not intended to isolate, point fingers or personally attack mrfaithandphysics or JonDyou or any other individual, troll or psychological warfare agent, but is a a message/ lesson to sincere genuine independent individual GGN viewers, and even trolls and/or psychological warfare agents. If you are or can become aware that the topics discussed in regards to any video that questions authority or the established “system” are met by stiff opposition then you should realize that I don't want to be neutralized by a troll and/or /PsyOp. I very seldom "censor" or block those who aren't commenting on the issues covered in the video and /or consume much of my time in the comment board by not asking questions that are intended to reach a truth or resolution but to distract me and the other viewers from the intended message of the content provided in a video. Mainstream media does a good enough job providing a similar circus show of disinformation and I will not allow it. It is through reasoning/ analytical thoughts, emotions/feeling that help shape whether block someone, but ultimately it is my intuition that makes the final decision. If I blocked you and you were sincerely an independent individual that is not being influence by an outside source/entity then I apologize, but if not then you surely deserved it.
This “person” has challenged me. That has led me to do some long overdue writing so in that respect I thank you mrfaithandphysics or JonDyou. This is what life is all about. May the benevolent creator of the universe or universes bless you.
No comments:
Post a Comment